Question Video: Understanding the Endosymbiotic Theory of the Origins of the Mitochondrion | Nagwa Question Video: Understanding the Endosymbiotic Theory of the Origins of the Mitochondrion | Nagwa

Question Video: Understanding the Endosymbiotic Theory of the Origins of the Mitochondrion Biology • Third Year of Secondary School

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live Biology sessions on Nagwa Classes to learn more about this topic from an expert teacher!

Mitochondria, organelles found in eukaryotic cells (shown in the figure), have their own circular loops of DNA. According to the endosymbiotic theory, what does this suggest about the evolution of mitochondria?

02:57

Video Transcript

Mitochondria, organelles found in eukaryotic cells, shown in the figure, have their own circular loops of DNA. According to the endosymbiotic theory, what does this suggest about the evolution of mitochondria? (A) Mitochondria were previously separate, prokaryotic organisms before being incorporated in eukaryotes. (B) Mitochondria have evolved to be separate, parasitic organelles within the cells of a eukaryote. (C) Mitochondria have had many mutations in their DNA, so they now resemble the structure of bacterial DNA.

This question is asking us about mitochondria, which are organelles found in eukaryotes that provide the cell with energy in the form of ATP. How mitochondria came to be is proposed by the endosymbiotic theory.

This theory states that an early eukaryotic cell that didn’t have mitochondria ingested a prokaryote that was capable of aerobic respiration. The eukaryote and prokaryote would then enter in a symbiotic relationship, where both organisms would benefit. The prokaryote would have provided energy in the form of ATP, and the eukaryote would’ve provided nutrients to the prokaryote. Over billions of years of evolution, the prokaryote would lose many of its genes because the eukaryote could provide for its survival. And this aerobic prokaryote would become the mitochondria that we know today.

There’s multiple lines of evidence for the endosymbiotic theory. Mitochondria have their own DNA separate from the nucleus of the cell. And this DNA is circular, just like a prokaryote. Mitochondria perform their own protein synthesis and have their own ribosomes that are separate from the cell. These ribosomes are very similar to prokaryotic ribosomes. Prokaryotes and mitochondria are also similar sizes. There’s additional evidence on top of this that all point to mitochondria evolving from an aerobic prokaryote.

Now let’s go through the answer choices to see which one is a correct interpretation of the endosymbiotic theory.

Answer choice (A) seems to be correct because it explains that mitochondria were a separate, prokaryotic organism before being incorporated into eukaryotes. But let’s look at the other options to be sure.

Answer choice (B) is incorrect because mitochondria and eukaryotes evolved to have a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship, where both the eukaryote and mitochondrial ancestor benefited, and not a parasitic one.

Answer choice (C) is also incorrect because it should be the other way around, that bacterial, or prokaryotic, DNA has had mutations over the course of evolution and it now resembles mitochondrial DNA.

Therefore, the correct option regarding the evolution of mitochondria is given by answer choice (A). Mitochondria were previously separate, prokaryotic organisms before being incorporated in eukaryotes.

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live sessions on Nagwa Classes to boost your learning with guidance and advice from an expert teacher!

  • Interactive Sessions
  • Chat & Messaging
  • Realistic Exam Questions

Nagwa uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about our Privacy Policy