Question Video: Using the Center of Mass Formula for Uniform Rods to Find the Distance between Its Center of Mass and a Point | Nagwa Question Video: Using the Center of Mass Formula for Uniform Rods to Find the Distance between Its Center of Mass and a Point | Nagwa

Question Video: Using the Center of Mass Formula for Uniform Rods to Find the Distance between Its Center of Mass and a Point Mathematics • Third Year of Secondary School

A uniform rod 𝐴𝐵𝐶 of length 46 cm was bent at its midpoint 𝐵 then suspended freely from 𝐴. Given that 𝐵𝐶 is horizontal when the rod is hanging in its equilibrium position, determine the distance between the center of gravity of the rod and 𝐴.

10:33

Video Transcript

A uniform rod 𝐴𝐵𝐶 of length 46 centimeters was bent at its midpoint 𝐵 then suspended freely from 𝐴. Given that 𝐵𝐶 is horizontal when the rod is hanging in its equilibrium position, determine the distance between the center of gravity of the rod and 𝐴.

In this question, we are asked to find the distance between the center of gravity of an object and a certain point without being told what the precise shape of the object is. We are told that the uniform rod is bent at its midpoint, but we are not given the angle of the bend. The clues we are given are that the rod is suspended freely from 𝐴 and that when the rod is hanging in its equilibrium position, 𝐵𝐶 is horizontal. The rod’s given length of 46 centimeters is somewhat trivial since the problem procedure would be the same regardless of the length of the rod. So, let’s call the length 𝐿 to simplify the algebra.

Let’s draw a rough diagram of the scenario. We have a uniform rod, 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶, which is bent at its midpoint 𝐵. When suspended freely from 𝐴, its equilibrium position is such that 𝐵𝐶 is a horizontal line. Since 𝐵 is the midpoint of the rod, 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐵𝐶 are both the same length, half the total length of the rod, 𝐿 over two. Since 𝐵𝐶 is horizontal, the vertical line dropped from 𝐴 intersects it at a right angle.

We can think of this bent rod as two separate rods, 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐵𝐶. Recall that the center of mass of a uniform rod is at its midpoint. So if we have a uniform rod of length 𝐿 over two, the center of mass is 𝐿 over four from either end. Going back to our diagram then, the centers of mass of the rods 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐵𝐶 are 𝐿 over four from either of their ends. The center of mass of the complete rod, which we will call 𝑃, will be at the midpoint of the line between the two center of masses of the two separate rods. When hanging in its equilibrium position, the center of mass will also be directly below the suspension point 𝐴. 𝑃 therefore lies at the intersection of the line between the two midpoints of the two separate rods and the vertical line dropped from 𝐴.

The distance we need to find is the distance between 𝐴 and 𝑃. There are a few ways we can go about this. The ultimate aim is to find a right triangle for which 𝐴𝑃 is one of its sides and we know the other two sides from which we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of 𝐴𝑃. However, currently there are no right triangles in this diagram whose sides we know. We therefore need to construct one somehow.

One method is to define a new line between 𝐴 and 𝐶. We now have an isosceles triangle with two identical sides of 𝐿 over two. If we draw a new line from 𝐵 through the point 𝑃, it intersects the line 𝐴𝐶 at its midpoint 𝐸, splitting the isosceles triangle in two.

We do not yet know the length of the side 𝐴𝐶. Let’s call it two 𝑏. So, the length of 𝐴𝐸 is 𝑏, and the length of 𝐶𝐸 is also 𝑏. Since 𝑃 is the midpoint of the two centers of mass of the two separate rods, it is also the midpoint of 𝐵𝐸. Therefore, the lines 𝐵𝑃 and 𝐸𝑃 also have the same length, which we’ll call ℎ. Looking at the diagram again, we now have a right triangle 𝐴𝐸𝑃, where 𝐴𝑃 is one of the sides and the other two sides are 𝑏 and ℎ. If we can find the lengths of 𝑏 and ℎ, then we can find the length of 𝐴𝑃.

Let’s call what we need to find the length of 𝐴𝑃 𝑑. Our end goal is to find 𝑑 using the Pythagorean theorem with the values of 𝑏 and ℎ. 𝑑 is equal to the square root of 𝑏 squared plus ℎ squared. We therefore first need to find the values of 𝑏 and ℎ in terms of the length of the rod 𝐿. Consider the triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐸. It is a right triangle with a hypotenuse of 𝐿 over two, and the other two sides are 𝑏 and two ℎ.

Using the Pythagorean theorem then, 𝑏 squared plus two ℎ all squared is equal to 𝐿 over two all squared. Simplifying and rearranging for 𝑏 squared gives 𝑏 squared equals 𝐿 squared over four minus four ℎ squared. We can therefore substitute this expression of 𝑏 squared into our final equation so that 𝑑 is equal to the square root of 𝐿 squared over four minus three ℎ squared.

We therefore need only find the value of ℎ in terms of the length of the rod 𝐿, and we will have our answer. Finding the value of ℎ however is not yet trivial since we do not yet have any right triangles where ℎ is one of its sides and the other two sides we know. Looking at the diagram again, we have two right triangles here, each with a side ℎ. But we do not yet know the values of the other sides. The line 𝐵𝐸 bisects the isosceles triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶. Let’s call the midpoints of the two separate rods 𝑀 one and 𝑀 two, respectively.

These two triangles 𝐵𝑀 one 𝑃 and 𝐵𝑀 two 𝑃 are similar triangles, meaning that they have all the same angles. They have a right angle. And since 𝐵𝐸 bisects the isosceles triangle, they have the same angle here, 𝜃. Recall that similar triangles have the property that the ratios of all of their sides are the same. So, for example, the ratio of the hypotenuse to the second longest side is the same in both triangles. In the first purple triangle, the length of the hypotenuse is 𝐿 over four, and the length of the adjacent side is ℎ.

In the second green triangle, the length of the hypotenuse is ℎ and the length of the adjacent side is the length of 𝐵𝑀 two, which we’ll call 𝑥. So, for the first triangle, we have cos 𝜃 equals ℎ over 𝐿 over four. And for the second triangle, we have cos 𝜃 equals 𝑥 over ℎ. 𝜃 is the same angle for both triangles. So, cos 𝜃 has the same value. Therefore, ℎ over 𝐿 over four is equal to 𝑥 over ℎ. Rearranging this equation gives us ℎ squared equals 𝑥𝐿 over four. We can substitute this expression for ℎ squared into our final equation for 𝑑, giving us 𝑑 equals the square root of 𝐿 squared over four minus three 𝑥𝐿 over four.

So, the final step is to find the value of 𝑥 in terms of 𝐿. Going back to our main diagram, 𝑥 is the length of the side of this green triangle here, which is the distance between the point 𝐵 and the point where the vertical line from 𝐴 meets the line 𝐵𝐶. Let’s call this point of intersection 𝐹. Before going any further, let’s redraw the main isosceles triangle. Let’s rotate the triangle so that 𝐴𝐶 is now horizontal and 𝐵 is at the top. The point 𝑃 is halfway between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and halfway up the triangle. The line from 𝐴, which passes through the point 𝑃, meets the line 𝐵𝐶 at the point 𝐹.

What we want to find is the length 𝑥 of the line 𝐵𝐹. This is equivalent to finding how far along the line 𝐵𝐶 the point 𝐹 is. Consider completing the rectangle of this triangle by drawing a vertical line upwards from 𝐴 and 𝐶 to the altitude of the triangle and then a horizontal line between their two endpoints. The point 𝑃 is now the centroid of this rectangle since it was halfway up the triangle and halfway along the line 𝐴𝐶. If we extend the line 𝐴𝐹, it therefore meets the rectangle at its corner. This creates two new triangles, one and two. Since they are formed by the intersection of two straight lines and two horizontal lines, these two triangles are similar.

Recall from the original diagram that the length of 𝐴𝐶 is two 𝑏. Since the point 𝐵 is at the midpoint of the top side of the rectangle, this length here is 𝑏. The line 𝐵𝐶 meets the horizontal line containing 𝑃 at halfway to this midpoint. The length of this side of triangle two is therefore 𝑏 over two. Let’s now take a closer look at these two triangles.

These two triangles are formed by the intersection of two straight lines and two horizontal lines of length 𝑏 and 𝑏 over two. These two triangles are therefore similar and share a Z angle here of 𝜃. The ratio of the larger triangle’s top side 𝑏 to its adjacent side 𝑥 is therefore equal to the ratio of the smaller triangle’s bottom side 𝑏 over two to its adjacent side. Let’s call it 𝑦. So, we have 𝑏 over 𝑥 equals 𝑏 over two all over 𝑦. The 𝑏’s on both sides will cancel. And rearranging gives us 𝑥 is equal to two 𝑦.

Recall from the original diagram that the length of the side 𝐵𝐶 is equal to 𝐿 over two. The two sides of these triangles, 𝑥 and 𝑦, therefore add together to give half the length of this side, 𝐿 over four. Since 𝑥 is equal to two 𝑦, 𝑦 is equal to 𝑥 over two. So, we have 𝑥 plus 𝑥 over two equals 𝐿 over four. Rearranging for 𝑥 will give us 𝑥 equals 𝐿 over six. We now have 𝑥 exclusively in terms of 𝐿 and therefore everything we need to find 𝑑.

Substituting in the expression 𝑥 equals 𝐿 over six, we get 𝑑 equals the square root of 𝐿 squared over four minus three 𝐿 squared over 24. Placing over the common denominator of 24 gives us the square root of six 𝐿 squared minus three 𝐿 squared over 24. Simplifying gives us 𝐿 root three over root 24. Simplifying further gives us 𝐿 root two over four. Substituting the original length of the rod, 46 centimeters, gives us 46 root two over four. And simplifying once more gives us the final answer. The distance between the center of gravity of the rod and 𝐴 𝑑 equals 23 root two over two centimeters.

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live sessions on Nagwa Classes to boost your learning with guidance and advice from an expert teacher!

  • Interactive Sessions
  • Chat & Messaging
  • Realistic Exam Questions

Nagwa uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about our Privacy Policy