Question Video: Factorizing Trinomials by Taking Out the Greatest Common Factor | Nagwa Question Video: Factorizing Trinomials by Taking Out the Greatest Common Factor | Nagwa

Question Video: Factorizing Trinomials by Taking Out the Greatest Common Factor

Factorize fully 24π‘₯⁡ βˆ’ 34π‘₯Β³ + 12π‘₯.

04:25

Video Transcript

Factor fully 24π‘₯ to the fifth power minus 34π‘₯ cubed plus 12π‘₯.

In order to factor this, we first want to check and see if any of these terms have common factors. We notice that all three coefficients are even, which means they have a factor of two. And then we see that they all have at least one π‘₯, which means we can factor out an π‘₯. If we factor two π‘₯ out of 24π‘₯ to the fifth power, we get 12π‘₯ to the fourth power. If we factor two π‘₯ out of negative 34π‘₯ cubed, we get negative 17π‘₯ squared. And factoring out a two π‘₯ from 12π‘₯ leaves us with positive six.

Here, we’re dealing with a higher-order polynomial, and so we probably need a new strategy to help us factorize fully. And one of those strategies is to use 𝑒-substitution. If we let 𝑒 equal π‘₯ squared, then we can rewrite 12π‘₯ to the fourth power as 12 times 𝑒 squared. 𝑒 squared is equal to π‘₯ squared squared, which is π‘₯ to the fourth power. Our second term then becomes 17𝑒, and the six stays the same. We do this because we’re more used to working with polynomials with a degree of two.

This doesn’t fully solve our problem though because we still have a leading coefficient of 12, which means we’ll have lots of factors to consider. We’ll have to consider the factors of 12 and the factors of six. With 12, we have one and 12, two and six, or three and four. With six, we have one and six or two and three. If we start with the factors one and 12, we’ll have 𝑒 times 12𝑒 and then we could consider one and six. We have to multiply the outsides and the insides, and they have to add together to equal negative 17. This means that both values should be negative because they need to multiply together to equal positive six. In this case, we’d have negative six 𝑒 minus 12𝑒, which is close. It’s negative 18𝑒, but it’s not the exact factors.

If we tried to switch the six and one, we’d be multiplying negative six by 12𝑒, which is negative 72𝑒, far too much. We can move on to two and three. In this case, we’d have negative three 𝑒 minus 24𝑒. Negative 27𝑒 doesn’t work. Now, we could systematically keep working through all the options until we find the correct one. Another strategy is to look at these factors and see if you can find pairs that would add up to negative 17. We know that the factors of six will all need to be negative. So we might think six times negative three is negative 18 plus two times negative two, which is negative four. But negative 18 minus four is not the right value.

But what about three times negative three, which is negative nine, and four times negative two, which is negative eight? Negative nine plus negative eight does equal negative 17. And that means we need three 𝑒 to be multiplied by negative three, so we put those on the outside. And we need four 𝑒 to be multiplied by negative two, so we put both of those on the inside. It’s probably worth quickly checking our work here. Three 𝑒 times four 𝑒 is 12𝑒 squared. Three 𝑒 times negative three is negative nine 𝑒. Negative two times negative four 𝑒 is negative eight 𝑒. And negative two times negative three is positive six, which does equal 12𝑒 squared minus 17𝑒 plus six.

Now that we have this factorized form and it doesn’t appear that we can factor anything else, we want to substitute back in π‘₯ squared for 𝑒, so that we have two π‘₯ times three π‘₯ squared minus two times four π‘₯ squared minus three.

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live sessions on Nagwa Classes to boost your learning with guidance and advice from an expert teacher!

  • Interactive Sessions
  • Chat & Messaging
  • Realistic Exam Questions

Nagwa uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about our Privacy Policy