Question Video: Evaluating Permutations and Factorials to Find Unknowns | Nagwa Question Video: Evaluating Permutations and Factorials to Find Unknowns | Nagwa

Question Video: Evaluating Permutations and Factorials to Find Unknowns Mathematics • Third Year of Secondary School

If (𝑥 − 47)! × 𝑥𝑃47 = 3906(𝑥 − 2)!, find the value of 𝑥.

05:16

Video Transcript

If 𝑥 minus 47 factorial times 𝑥𝑃47 equals 3906 times 𝑥 minus two factorial, find the value of 𝑥.

To solve for 𝑥, we’ll need to understand what is meant by 𝑥𝑃47 and also what is meant by factorial. The notation 𝑛𝑃𝑟, where 𝑛 and 𝑟 are both nonnegative integers, is defined as the fraction 𝑛 factorial divided by 𝑛 minus 𝑟 factorial. It turns out that this calculation gives the number of ways to select 𝑟 unique objects from a group of 𝑛 unique objects if order matters. In other words, it’s the number of permutations of 𝑟 things taken from a group of 𝑛 things, hence the notation 𝑃 for permutation.

The formula for 𝑛𝑃𝑟 also uses the factorial notation, so let’s define factorial. For a positive integer 𝑛, 𝑛 factorial is defined as the product of all of the positive integers from one to 𝑛 inclusive. So 𝑛 factorial is 𝑛 times 𝑛 minus one times 𝑛 minus two etcetera times three times two times one. As a side note, we also say that zero factorial is equal to one.

Anyway, looking at the definition of factorial, we see that on the right-hand side we have 𝑛 times the product of all of the positive integers from one to 𝑛 minus one, in other words, 𝑛 times 𝑛 minus one factorial. This actually gives an alternate way to define factorial. 𝑛 factorial is 𝑛 times 𝑛 minus one factorial. Anyway, these three definitions are all that we need to solve our equation. Let’s start with the right-hand side, and we’ll expand out 𝑥𝑃47 in terms of factorials.

So we have that 𝑥 minus 47 factorial times 𝑥𝑃47 is equal to 𝑥 minus 47 factorial times 𝑥 factorial divided by 𝑥 minus 47 factorial. To arrive at this expression, we replaced 𝑛 with 𝑥 and 𝑟 with 47 in the definition of 𝑛𝑃𝑟. Looking at the expression on the right-hand side, we see we have 𝑥 minus 47 factorial divided by 𝑥 minus 47 factorial. But anything divided by itself is just one, so we’re left with 𝑥 factorial on the right-hand side. But we know that this expression is equal to the right-hand side of our original equation. So we can now set up the equation 𝑥 factorial equals 3906 times 𝑥 minus two factorial.

To continue simplifying our expression, let’s see what happens when we use our second definition for factorial twice. If we let 𝑛 minus one take the place of 𝑛, we have that 𝑛 minus one factorial is equal to 𝑛 minus one times 𝑛 minus two factorial. But if we substitute this back into our original definition for 𝑛 factorial, we see that 𝑛 factorial is 𝑛 times 𝑛 minus one times 𝑛 minus two factorial. In fact, by repeatedly using this definition, we can expand 𝑛 factorial for as many terms as we need. For our equation, twice will be enough because we have an 𝑥 minus two factorial on the right-hand side and an 𝑥 factorial on the left-hand side.

So expanding 𝑥 factorial, we have 𝑥 times 𝑥 minus one times 𝑥 minus two factorial is equal to 3906 times 𝑥 minus two factorial. Now we have a common factor of 𝑥 minus two factorial on both sides. So let’s divide both sides of this equation by 𝑥 minus two factorial. This leaves us with 𝑥 times 𝑥 minus one equals 3906. This is a quadratic equation that we can solve by whatever algebraic technique we prefer. Let’s illustrate one way that is particularly useful for problems involving factorials because we know that 𝑥 must be an integer.

We observe that if 𝑥 is restricted to be an integer, 𝑥 and 𝑥 minus one are consecutive integers, which means that their value is quite similar. This means that 𝑥 minus one is approximately equal to 𝑥, so 𝑥 times 𝑥 minus one is approximately 𝑥 squared. Now this is not entirely accurate, but it does mean that 𝑥 is pretty close to the square root of 3906. We know this can’t be perfectly accurate because 𝑥 is an integer and the square root of 3906 is not an integer. However, once we calculate the square root of 3906, we know that 𝑥 is one of the integers very near to that number. And usually, we’ll only need to try one or two values before we find the correct one.

The square root of 3906 is approximately 62.5. We’ve only reported this number to one decimal place because all we care about are the nearby integers. Our immediate possibilities for 𝑥 are then 63 and 62, which are the two integers nearest to 62.5. Of these two numbers, 63 is the most sensible first guess because we know that 𝑥 times 𝑥 minus one is 3906 and 𝑥 is bigger than 𝑥 minus one. And indeed, we find that 63 times 62 is exactly 3906. This confirms our educated guess that 𝑥 is in fact 63.

Approximating 𝑥 by taking a root is a generally applicable technique whenever we have a product of several consecutive positive integers. If we have 𝑛 consecutive integers, we take the 𝑛th root of their product. And the value that we get is fairly close to the average of those consecutive integers. Once we’ve approximated the average value of the consecutive integers, a little trial and error gives us the full list.

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live sessions on Nagwa Classes to boost your learning with guidance and advice from an expert teacher!

  • Interactive Sessions
  • Chat & Messaging
  • Realistic Exam Questions

Nagwa uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about our Privacy Policy