Question Video: Intermediate Value Theorem | Nagwa Question Video: Intermediate Value Theorem | Nagwa

Question Video: Intermediate Value Theorem Mathematics

If 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous over [0, 3], 𝑓(0) > 0, and 𝑓(3) > 0, can we use the intermediate value theorem to conclude that 𝑓(𝑥) has no zeros in the interval [0, 3]?

02:12

Video Transcript

If 𝑓 of 𝑥 is continuous over the closed interval from zero to three, 𝑓 of zero is greater than zero, and 𝑓 of three is greater than zero, can we use the intermediate value theorem to conclude that 𝑓 of 𝑥 has no zeros in the interval from zero to three?

Let’s have a go at sketching this scenario on a graph. We know that 𝑓 of zero is positive. Let’s draw it here and 𝑓 of three is also positive. So maybe, the graph goes through this point and 𝑓 of 𝑥 is continuous. Does this mean that 𝑓 of 𝑥 has no zeros in the interval from zero to three? Well, no. We can sketch a graph of a continuous function 𝑓 for which both 𝑓 of zero and 𝑓 of three are positive, but which has zeros in the closed interval from zero to three. So we’d hope that we can’t use the intermediate value theorem to conclude that 𝑓 of 𝑥 has no zeros because it simply isn’t true.

Why might we think that the intermediate value theorem implies this incorrect statement? What the intermediate value theorem states is that if 𝑓 is continuous on the closed interval from 𝑎 to 𝑏 and 𝑁 is the number between 𝑓 of 𝑎 and 𝑓 of 𝑏, then there exists a number 𝑐 in the open interval from 𝑎 to 𝑏 such that 𝑓 of 𝑐 equals 𝑁. Setting 𝑁 equal to zero, we get the special case that if 𝑓 is a continuous function and 𝑓 of 𝑎 and 𝑓 of 𝑏 have opposite signs, then there exists a number 𝑐 in the open interval from 𝑎 to 𝑏 such that 𝑓 of 𝑐 equals zero. In other words, there is a zero of the function 𝑓 in the interval.

This special case is sometimes known as Bolzano’s theorem. We have to be careful here. The intermediate value theorem does not mean that if 𝑁 is not between 𝑓 of 𝑎 and 𝑓 of 𝑏, then there does not exist a number 𝑐 in the open interval from 𝑎 to 𝑏 such that 𝑓 of 𝑐 equals 𝑁. So the special case does not mean that if 𝑓 of 𝑎 and 𝑓 of 𝑏 have the same sign. In other words, if they’re both positive or both negative, then there cannot exist a number 𝑐, which is a root of 𝑓. This is a statement that we’re asked about in the question and it does not follow from the intermediate value theorem. Our answer is, therefore, no. We cannot conclude that 𝑓 of 𝑥 has no zeros in the interval from zero to three.

Join Nagwa Classes

Attend live sessions on Nagwa Classes to boost your learning with guidance and advice from an expert teacher!

  • Interactive Sessions
  • Chat & Messaging
  • Realistic Exam Questions

Nagwa uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about our Privacy Policy