### Video Transcript

In this video, we will learn how to
find the images of points, lines, and shapes after their reflection in the π₯- or
π¦-axis on the coordinate plane.

Reflection is a type of geometric
transformation. Geometric transformations are
processes that map one geometric figure, such as a point, line segment, or shape,
onto another. In the case of a reflection, a
geometric figure, which we call the object, is mapped onto a congruent figure called
the image. We will consider three types of
reflections here: firstly, reflection in the π₯-axis; secondly, reflection in the
π¦-axis; and finally, reflection in the origin. Weβll begin with an example of
identifying a reflection in the π₯-axis.

Which pair of triangles
represents a reflection in the π₯-axis?

To answer this question, we
need to imagine placing a mirror along the π₯-axis. When we do this, all objects
will be reflected onto the opposite side of the mirror. Objects that were originally
above the mirror line will be reflected below it. And objects that were
originally below the mirror line will be reflected above it. The image of each object will
be the same size as the original. And each vertex will be the
same distance away from the mirror, just in the opposite direction. By visualizing the effect
reflection in the π₯-axis will have, we can see that triangles π΄ and π΅
represent a reflection in the π₯-axis.

We can also look more closely
at each vertex. Taking triangle π΄ to be the
object, we can see that the vertex negative two, two is originally two units
above the π₯-axis. The image of this vertex is at
negative two, negative two. The vertex is in the same
horizontal position but is now two units below the π₯-axis. So itβs the same vertical
distance from the mirror, but in the opposite direction. The same is true for each of
the other two vertices. The pair of triangles that
represents a reflection in the π₯-axis is π΄ and π΅.

In the previous example, we
identified that the point negative two, two was mapped to the point negative two,
negative two by reflection in the π₯-axis. For the other two vertices of the
triangle, the point negative three, five was mapped to negative three, negative
five. And the point negative five, three
was mapped to negative five, negative three. We can observe a pattern in these
mappings. In each case, the π₯-coordinate is
unchanged, but the π¦-coordinate has changed sign or, in other words, has been
multiplied by negative one.

We can express this as a general
result. A reflection in the π₯-axis maps a
point π with coordinates π₯, π¦ to the point π prime with coordinates π₯, negative
π¦. Recalling this result gives a
useful method for finding the image of a point under reflection in the π₯-axis
without needing to perform the transformation graphically.

Next, letβs consider what happens
when we reflect an object in the π¦-axis.

Find the coordinates of the
images of the points π΄, π΅, πΆ, and π· after reflection in the π¦-axis.

To reflect these points in the
π¦-axis, we need to imagine placing a mirror along the π¦-axis. The mirror is vertical, so the
effect of reflecting in this line will be horizontal. Any point in the coordinate
plane will be reflected onto the opposite side of the mirror and will appear the
same distance behind the mirror as it originally was in front of the mirror.

Letβs start with point π΄,
which has coordinates eight, six. This point is eight units to
the right of the mirror. So its image will appear eight
units to the left of the mirror at the same vertical height. The image of point π΄ will
therefore be negative eight, six.

Point π΅ has coordinates eight,
one and is directly below point π΄. The image of point π΅ will
therefore be directly below the image of point π΄, so with an π₯-coordinate of
negative eight, and will have the same π¦-coordinate as the original point
π΅. The image of point π΅ is the
point negative eight, one.

The coordinates of points πΆ
and π· are two, one and two, six, respectively. Each of these points is two
units to the right of the mirror. So their image will be two
units to the left of the mirror. The images of points πΆ and π·
are therefore at negative two, one and negative two, six, respectively. If we were to join the images
of the four vertices together, we can see that the shape created is congruent to
the original rectangle π΄π΅πΆπ·.

It isnβt immediately obvious
because this shape is symmetrical, but its orientation has also changed. The coordinates of the images
of points π΄, π΅, πΆ, and π· are negative eight, six; negative eight, one;
negative two, one; and negative two, six.

Letβs now generalize what we saw in
the previous example. Looking at the coordinates of each
point and its image following reflection in the π¦-axis, we can observe that the
π¦-coordinate remains the same. But this time the π₯-coordinate
changes sign. Equivalently, we can say that the
π₯-coordinate is multiplied by negative one. We can write a general rule to
describe this. A reflection in the π¦-axis maps a
point π with coordinates π₯, π¦ to a point π prime with coordinates negative π₯,
π¦. This result enables us to find the
coordinates of the image of a point under reflection in the π¦-axis without
performing the transformation graphically.

Now that weβve seen examples of
reflections in both the π₯- and π¦-axes, letβs see how we can use this to solve
problems.

Three points π΄, π΅, and πΆ
with coordinates one, three; one, two; and four, one, respectively, are
reflected in the π₯-axis to the points π΄ prime, π΅ prime, and πΆ prime. Determine the coordinates of π΄
prime, π΅ prime, and πΆ prime. Is the measure of angle π΄π΅πΆ
less than, greater than, or equal to the measure of angle π΄ prime π΅ prime πΆ
prime?

We recall first that a
reflection in the π₯-axis maps a point with coordinates π₯, π¦ to the point with
coordinates π₯, negative π¦. The π₯-coordinate stays the
same, and the π¦-coordinate is multiplied by negative one. We can then apply this
transformation to each point separately. Point π΄, which has coordinates
one, three, is mapped to the point one, negative three. Point π΅ with coordinates one,
two is mapped to one, negative two. And point πΆ with coordinates
four, one is mapped to four, negative one.

To answer the second part of
the question, it may be helpful to sketch the points π΄, π΅, and πΆ together
with their images π΄ prime, π΅ prime, and πΆ prime on a coordinate grid. The angles weβre interested in
are angle π΄π΅πΆ and angle π΄ prime π΅ prime πΆ prime, which are marked on the
figure. We can see that these are both
obtuse angles, which appear to be of equal measure. If we recall that reflections
map a geometric figure to a congruent geometric figure, then we can deduce that
angles π΄π΅πΆ and π΄ prime π΅ prime πΆ prime must be of equal measure, as they
are corresponding angles in congruent triangles.

So weβve completed the
problem. Weβve found the coordinates of
π΄ prime, π΅ prime, and πΆ prime and determined that the two angles are of equal
measure.

This example demonstrates one of
the key properties of reflection in a line, which weβll now consider in more
detail.

There are four key properties of
reflection in a line. Firstly, reflection in a line
preserves the lengths of line segments. For example, if the line segment
π΄π΅ is reflected in the π¦-axis, its image π΄ prime π΅ prime is of equal
length. Secondly, it preserves the measures
of angles, as we saw in the previous example. Thirdly, reflection in a line
preserves the betweenness property. This means that if point π΅ lies
between points π΄ and πΆ, then its image lies between the images of points π΄ and
πΆ. Finally, reflection in a line
preserves parallelism. If the line segment π΄π΅ is
parallel to the line segment πΆπ·, then the line segment π΄ prime π΅ prime is
parallel to πΆ prime π· prime.

The final type of reflection weβre
going to consider here is reflection in a point, which is a little different to
reflecting in a line such as the π₯- or π¦-axis. Suppose we have an object π΄ that
we want to reflect in a point π. The image of point π΄ is the point
π΄ prime such that π is the midpoint of the line segment connecting π΄ and π΄
prime. The point π is called the center
of reflection and is the only point that is unchanged under this particular
reflection. On a coordinate grid, the only
point we need to be able to reflect objects in is the origin.

Letβs consider what happens to this
triangle when we reflect it in the origin. Taking each vertex in turn, we can
draw the line connecting this point to the origin. We then find the point on the
opposite side of the origin such that the origin is exactly halfway between this
point and the original. We could do this either by
measuring or by considering that in this case the original point is one square right
and two squares up from the origin. So, if we do this in reverse and go
one square left and two squares down from the origin, the distance from the origin
will be the same.

We can repeat this process for each
vertex and then join the three points together to give the image of the orange
triangle following reflection in the origin. Considering the coordinates of each
point and its image, we can observe that in every case, both the π₯- and
π¦-coordinates have changed sign. We can generalize this result as
reflection in the origin maps a point π with coordinates π₯, π¦ to a point π prime
with coordinates negative π₯, negative π¦.

Reflection in the origin has an
interesting property that differs from reflection in a line, which will become
apparent if we label corresponding vertices in the two triangles in our figure with
letters. Note that in the original triangle
π΄π΅πΆ, the vertices are labeled in clockwise order, and the same is true of the
image π΄ prime π΅ prime πΆ prime. This leads to an important
property. Reflection about the origin
preserves orientation of the vertices. Itβs important to understand that
we donβt mean the orientation of the shape itself is preserved. But the labeling of the vertices in
a clockwise or counterclockwise direction is preserved.

Letβs now look at an example of
reflection in the origin.

Which graph represents
reflecting the triangle π΄π΅πΆ about the origin?

Weβre asked about the effect of
reflecting triangle π΄π΅πΆ in a point, which is the origin. So triangle π΄π΅πΆ is the
object, and we need to determine which of the four triangles is the correct
image for this transformation.

We recall that reflection about
the origin maps a general point π with coordinates π₯, π¦ to the point π prime
with coordinates negative π₯, negative π¦. Or in other words, π and π
prime have the same coordinates but with opposite signs. The two points are the same
distance from the origin, but on opposite sides of it in a straight line.

We can see immediately then
that graph (A) cannot be the correct graph, because whilst the π₯-coordinates
have changed sign, the π¦-coordinates have not. Also, if we draw straight lines
from each vertex of triangle π΄π΅πΆ to be the origin and continue these lines,
we can see that the image of triangle π΄π΅πΆ after reflection about the origin
should be in the third quadrant. For this reason, we can
actually eliminate both (A) and (B) because the image is in the incorrect
quadrant. In graphs (C) and (D), however,
both images are in the third quadrant.

We can now recall a key
property of reflection in the origin, which is that orientation of the vertices
is preserved. This means that if the vertices
of the object are labeled in, for example, the clockwise direction, the same
will be true for the vertices of the image. Looking at triangle π΄π΅πΆ, we
can see that the ordering of the vertices is in fact counterclockwise, so the
same must be true for its image.

On graph (C), the direction of
labeling is also counterclockwise. But on graph (D), the direction
is clockwise. This allows us to rule option
(D) out. Only graph (C) remains. And we can check that this is
indeed correct by connecting corresponding vertices and observing that they are
indeed equal distance from the origin but on opposite sides in a straight
line. So option (C) is the correct
graph to represent a reflection of triangle π΄π΅πΆ about the origin.

Letβs now summarize the key points
from this video. A reflection on the coordinate
plane transforms a geometric figure, such as a point, line segment, or shape, to a
congruent geometric figure, which we call the image. For a general point π with
coordinates π₯, π¦, reflection in the π₯-axis maps the point π to the point π
prime with coordinates π₯, negative π¦. Or in other words the π¦-coordinate
changes sign. Reflection in the π¦-axis changes
the sign of the π₯-coordinate. So the point π is mapped to the
point π prime with coordinates negative π₯, π¦.

Reflection in the origin changes
the sign of both the π₯- and π¦-coordinates. The point π is mapped to the point
π prime with coordinates negative π₯, negative π¦. Reflection in a line preserves the
lengths of line segments, the measures of angles, the betweenness property, and
parallelism. Reflection about the origin
preserves the orientation of vertices, labeled in either a clockwise or
counterclockwise direction.